异次元杀阵影评(共10篇)

【www.ahstyy.net--空间说说】

异次元杀阵影评（一）:

为什么中文翻译成异次元杀阵,这部片子里哪里体现出了异次元的空间概念?
而且后来那个智障的孩子出去后,感觉那个世界也并不像是我们的世界,他的身影是渐渐被白光隐没了的.到底怎么回事呢?

电影原名为“Cube”,直接翻译为“立方体”.
我觉得应该是因为里面的立方体单元一直在运动过程中,而且每一个单元又有机关致人于死地,所以称为杀阵,其实第二部称为“异次元”更加贴切,里面涉及到很多不同时间空间的转换,更加像科幻片.
如果你想知道来龙去脉,建议你看一下第三部,也就是第一部的前传,是有人控制这个立方体的,像是军方的组织.

异次元杀阵影评（二）:

心慌方1和异次元杀阵2剧情一样吗?急!
看清问题啊.知道的快来回答!是心慌方第一部和异次元杀阵第二部.我看异次元杀阵2的简介好像和心慌方1差不多的意思.请问剧情相似吗,我已经看了心慌方1了.现在正在看心慌方·零 .不知道还有没有必要看异次元杀阵2..

心慌方就是异次元杀阵.
剧情不一样,而且第二部的画面效果更好,值得观看.

异次元杀阵影评（三）:

请问“质数的冥”到底是个什么东西?
今天看电影《异次元杀阵》中说有陷阱的房间都是用“质数的冥”来表示,还说这些都是天文数字,没有人算得出来,到底是怎么回事?

大合数一般很难分解成质数的乘积,这也是密码难破解的原因,所以说很难计算出来.

异次元杀阵影评（四）:

没看懂异次元杀阵,到底有没有机关的规律是什么啊,和房间号有什么关系?【异次元杀阵影评】

这个问题其实小学数学就能解释
每个房间的三个数,比如（4,28,6）,我随便写的,首先女学生认为这是个三维空间坐标,标明了该房间在整个“立方体大厦”里的坐标,女学生的认识并没有错,但这只是房间的实时坐标,因为看完电影就知道,房间是在变动,坐标也就跟着变动.
之后,女学生渐渐找到规律,她认为,在这个房间坐标里,只要3个元素,也就是那3个数里不存在质数,那么该房间就没有陷阱.如果这样来推断的话,我写的（4,28,6）房间就安全,因为4、28、6都不是质数.
但是后来她发现,并不是这样.这个数学陷阱其实是3个数不仅都不是质数,而且也不存在质因数,该房间才安全.这样看来,我写的 4=2x2、28=2x2x7、6=2x3,3个数的因子里都包含质数,所以该房间危险.

异次元杀阵影评（五）:

关于异次元杀阵1.2.3
里面的立方体到底是谁造的?/为什么要造这个东西 ,这些人是根据什么原则选进去的,为什么要杀这些人那.

我知道哈,
2和3情节中有所透漏了,造CUBE的是军方力量
2中那个4维空间是军方的一个实验体,做研究用的.
至于3,其实是1的前序,3中的解释是,CUBE是一个秩序森严军事设施,被选进去的人实际上是犯了死刑的罪犯或其他妨碍军方计划的人,他们进去前签订了志愿书,愿意以这种方式代替死刑,并被消除了记忆.
其实说实话,2和3都变味了,他们都是商业片,只有1才算是上原汁原味,我个人认为,2和3不应该拍,引入军方概念后,俗,就是一个字,俗.如果只看1的话,效果很好,根本不解释原因,悬念啊,让人想象空间更大了.

异次元杀阵影评（六）:

英语翻译
在《异次元杀阵2》中听到这句话,翻译成是“我的翅膀还在家里”,但是我想知道的是当人们说这句话的时候,【异次元杀阵影评】

没有看过这个电影,提供几个：
1.我不想和你计较
2.表示轻视,我不用wings都可以跟你打斗一番
3.表示幽默,他应该带的东西忘记带了,这下可麻烦烦了

异次元杀阵影评（七）:

笛卡尔坐标的点是怎么样产生的及转换问题,源自电影《异次元杀阵》
笛卡尔的坐标点是怎么定义的,为什么可以转换为直角坐标,这里
//笛卡尔坐标,它表示了点在空间中的位置,但却和直角坐标有区别,两种坐标可以相互转换.举个例子：某个点的笛卡尔坐标是493 ,454, 967,那它的X轴坐标就是4+9+3=16,Y轴坐标是4+5+4=13,Z轴坐标是9+6+7=22,因此这个点的直角坐标是(16, 13, 22)
还有,请解释：
//每一个房间的移动轨迹也隐藏在了笛卡尔坐标当中,比如坐标为477, 804, 539的房间,它的直角坐标为(18, 12, 17).要想知道这个房间的移动轨迹,可以这么做,对于每一个三为数数字作如下处理：
1. 百位数减去十位数
2. 十位数减去个位数
3. 个位数减去百位数
对三个数字都进行以上操作,也就是：
1. 477:4 - 7=-3 | 7-7=0 | 7-4=3
2. 804:8 - 0=8 | 0-4=-4 | 4-8=-4
3. 539:5 - 3=2 | 3-9=-6 |9-5=4
这样就得到了三个向量(- 3, 8, 2), (0, - 4, - 6)和(3, - 4, 4). 这三个向量表示了这个房间的移动轨迹,将转换成直角坐标的表示房间初始位置的坐标（可以看成向量）依次加上这三个向量,即：
(18, 12, 17) + (- 3, 8, 2) = (15 ,20, 19)
(15, 20, 19) + (0, - 4, - 6) = (15, 16, 13)
(15, 16, 13) + (3, - 4, 4) = (18, 12, 17)
---------------------------------------------
这上面的轨迹是怎么得到的,本人之前也矩阵高数之类,只是现在太久没用了,如果哪位高人知道,请解释一下,希望是自己的见解.不胜感激.
为什么笛卡尔坐标可以转直角，这三个点是哪里来的，有什么参照吗
不可能凭空生出三个坐标位置 高手解释一下
还有就是上面百位减十位，十位减个位 这样得到轨迹是依据什么

俺理解哈,这是2个3维坐标系之间的一种转换方式【单向的,只能从笛卡尔到直角】.
2个坐标系都是一般的3维空间直角坐标系.
那3个数字就是空间的1点的3个坐标.
比如,493 ,454,967是空间中某点在笛卡尔坐标系下的3个坐标.X=493,Y=454,Z=967.
同样的这个点,在直角坐标系中的3个坐标为16,13,22.x=16,y=13,z=22.
同样的这个点在不同坐标系的坐标之间的对应关系是,
x=X的各位数字之和,y=Y的各位数字之和,z=Z的各位数字之和.
X,Y,Z肯定不是凭空来的,是根据笛卡尔坐标系的原点,X,Y,Z轴正向上的单位向量算出来的.换句话说,设定了笛卡尔坐标系以后,空间中的任何点就都有了相对应的笛卡尔坐标了.【就把这个笛卡尔坐标系理解为游戏里的3维场景所在的1个3维空间坐标系就行了吧.】
X,Y,Z有了以后,就可以转换出x,y,z了.也就是知道了1个点的笛卡尔坐标以后,就可以得到对应的唯一的直角坐标了.【这个直角坐标系可以理解为游戏里的异空间.但它也是1个3维空间.】
在游戏里,房间是按照某种规律运动的.
但这个规律是关于异空间的【关于直角坐标系的】.
在异空间里,房间按照一定的速度,从1个点移动到另1个点.
3次移动为1个周期.
第1次移动的速度是房间的3个笛卡尔坐标的百位数字 - 十位数字.
第2次移动的速度是房间的3个笛卡尔坐标的十位数字 - 个位数字.
第3次移动的速度是房间的3个笛卡尔坐标的个位数字 - 百位数字.
【哈,如果某个房间的3个坐标的百位=十位=个位.这个房间就永远不会动了.比如（111,222,333）这样的房间,会静止在那..】
如果你知道了房间在某个时刻的笛卡尔坐标,你就可以推算出下一个时刻这个房间的直角坐标.然后根据直角坐标可以得到这个房间在笛卡尔坐标系中的可能的几个位置坐标.
比如,现在房间在笛卡尔坐标系下的位置坐标为（477,804,539）,根据你说的算法,在异空间里【也就是直角坐标系里】,第1次移动,房间会从（4+7+7,8+0+4,5+3+9）=（18,12,17）按照速度（4-7,8-0,5-3）=（-3,8,2）移动到（18,12,17）+（-3,8,2）= （15,20,19）.
第2次移动,房间会从（15,20,19）按照速度（7-7,0-4,3-9）=（0,-4,-6）移动到（15,20,19）+（0,-4,-6）=（15,16,13）.
第3次移动,房间会从（15,16,13）按照速度（7-4,4-8,9-5）=（3,-4,4）移动到（15,16,13）+（3,-4,4）= （18,12,17）.
【看到了吧,在异空间里,3次移动后,房间又回到了原位.因为3次移动的速度之和的3个分量都=百位-十位+十位-个位+个位-百位=0】
俺不能肯定的是,异空间【直角坐标系】里的1个点,是否对应着游戏的3维场景【笛卡尔坐标系】里的唯一的1个点.如果是的话,房间经过3次移动在游戏的3维场景中,也回到了原处.如果是的话,从直角坐标系到笛卡尔坐标系也应该有1种算法.如果不是的话,那就比较复杂了.即使房间在异空间里回到了原处,它也可能跑到了游戏的场景空间里的另外1个位置了.比如从（477,804,539）跑到了（747,408,359）之类的地方去了.

异次元杀阵影评（八）:

速求：《这个杀手不太冷》英文影评 高中水平就好 150 字左右

这里：

异次元杀阵影评（九）:

求杀死一只知更鸟英文影评,500字,原创,在线等.

以前刚好写过,再给点分吧
The story To Kill a Mocking Bird is told by Scout Finch,who was just six years old when the whole thing happened in 1932.Scout and her brother Jem were the direct witness.This film showed in the point of children’s view is particularly impressive.In the process of the story,Scout and Jem gradually grasp the essence of understanding,growing up,justice,and the challenge of belief.
Kids usually tend to believe the story of ghosts,so when Jem and Scout learn the horrible hearsay of their neighbor Boo,they always feel fully convinced and frightened.However,when Jem regularly get some little presents in a tree hole and get his folded pants after their exploration of Boo’s house,he begins to doubt about the thing and what kind of man Boo really is.That is quite something for a child to do so,because he collects all of the presents and is willing to suspect the fact that everyone else believes in.Maybe he is not firmly sure about his thoughts,but the process of doubting has thought him the important thing about understanding a person or anything else.The result is Boo saves him and his sister,and the misunderstanding is wiped out.
Scout is kind of a stubborn and naught girl.But she admires her father Atticus very much,so does Jem,because Atticus represents justice in their hearts.Kids also need expression and being understood even thought they are regarded as irascible and thoughtless by most adults.It is Atticus who never holds one-side views.He always gives opportunities to children or anyone else to make explanation for themselves.Influenced by their father,Jem and Scout believe that the world should be fair and harmonious.An impressive scene in the movie is that Jem and Scout are left in the car,while Ewell,who stigmatizes Tom Robinson as a criminal,stares at Jem ferociously.I can see that Jem is really frightened then.He can’t make sense of racial discrimination,but at that time,he is facing it directly,through the ugly and disgusting features of Ewell.Jem turns to his father out of his instinct because he just can’t bear the injustice and threaten then.Thereafter,when Jem and Scout come to the court and see the unjust judge about Robinson,they still feel shocked and confused by the real society.But somehow,they start learning to face it directly.That is rather a kind of growing up I think.
This film To Kill a Mocking Bird presents the world from the view of two kids which gives watchers a strong sense of reality because kids always are pure and close to the nature.Jem and Scout find the injustice and ugliness in the court.They once believed that their father could do everything but the result disappoints them and lets them know the kinds of guilt in the world.We watchers are easily moved by the real and sincere sense that the film conveys.

异次元杀阵影评（十）:

这个杀手不太冷 英语影评!
如题 或者美丽人生的也可以 不用太长 两三分钟的演讲

sensed that Luc Besson (director of The Fifth Element and La Femme Nikita) was,like Tarantino and many,many others before him,borrowed elements from various films and genres to create their own voice in the film.With Leon,I sensed him alluding to the crime films of France (i.e.Melville),Hong-Kong (i.e.Woo),and America (i.e.Scorsese),and making it into his own special brand for the story and characters.That his style visually is as compelling helps a great deal.The international version (which is the one I saw) is a little grittier,and more suggestive,than the version most American audiences saw in 1994 and on cable.But it is also a must-see if you are planning to see the film.It"s not a long movie,though it gives a good many details in its story.
Jean Reno has his star-making turn (at least for what he"s worth) in Leon- he"s ruthless contract killer who will kill just about anyone for the right price.He lives out of an apartment by himself,trying his best to ignore his noisy neighbors.One of the daughters is Mathilda (Natalie Portman,also a major breakthrough performance),abused by her whole family to no end.When a corrupt cop (Gary Oldman,one of the key villain performances of his career along with Dracula and Drexl in True Romance) goes and kills off her family while she"s away,she has no one else to turn to besides the reclusive killer.She knows what he does,and she wants in.The rest of the film is about their relationship,as it unfolds professionally and emotionally,leading to a tremendous,bloody climax.
One thing that struck me most about Leon is the fact that the film was more disturbing than I expected.The idea of a killer getting a pupil in a young teenage girl is unusual enough,but the way it unfolds I felt so much for her plight got to me at times.this doesn"t make Leon a tear-jerker (maybe for some,I"m not sure),but because of Portman"s dead-on portrayal,it makes the story work somehow,and is in a way as fantastical as it is naturalistic.There are also a few scenes that stuck out as being little masterpieces of all the elements coming together.The first is a brief scene,and crucial to showing the character of Leon early on- he takes a break after his contract,and sees a movie,a musical with Gene Kelly.He"s the only one in the theater,and he is completely in the grasp of what he sees on the screen.It"s the perfect touch of humanity and shows his only escape is into complete fantasy.
The second is when Leon and Mathilda are in a restaurant,after she has just gone through a day of training (there"s a hilarious montage that follows this scene).Mathilda is getting drunk off of champagne,rambling with words she may or may not mean.Suddenly,she starts laughing,and she laughs more,and harder.People in the restaurant look at her like she"s nuts.Leon is,of course,embarrassed.However,I thought this was just the right touch to this scene,where the kind of father-daughter relationship going on between Leon and Mathilda is revealed.It"s not exactly funny,not even really cringe worthy.It just is.The third scene is when Mathilda decides to pay a visit to the man who murdered her family.She follows the man into the bathroom,and waits.Suddenly,he (Oldman) appears out from behind a door.The language used,the tenseness of the two off of one another,it"s simply the most terrifying scene in the picture (aside from the first violent turning point).
So,basically,when Leon finished,I think I realized that my reaction was this:if I had seen this film when I was younger,be it in high school or even middle school,I would"ve responded to it even more strongly than I do now.There"s something very visceral about the nature of violence and killing,as well as the mentor/pupil relationship,that Besson really gets down pat.While some of the situations have the chance of slipping into clichés,it doesn"t happen very often.Leon:The Professional,is hard-hitting when it has to be,soft and funny when it can,and does stay with the viewer a few days after it"s over.
如果不满意,下面还有：

本文来源：https://www.ahstyy.net/ss/154256.html